Role of the Judiciary
Judges serve the public by
using their legal skills and knowledge to impartially interpret and apply the laws
and constitution to resolve cases. Their
day-to-day duties may vary depending on the type of judge and the type of case
under consideration. For information
about the different types of judges in Iowa see the topic "structure" under the
heading "About the Courts."
In all types of cases, a
judge serves as a referee. In this
capacity, a judge rules on issues under dispute such as the admissibility of
evidence. In some types of cases, a
judge, rather than a jury, always serves as the fact-finder. These cases include juvenile and probate
matters, domestic relations cases, and small claims. A judge also serves as the fact-finder in a civil case in which
the plaintiff does not request a jury and a criminal case in which the
defendant does not request a jury.
Common Misconceptions
Here are some common misconceptions
about the role of judges.
For instance, some people
mistakenly believe that judges have the authority to investigate alleged
criminal activity and file criminal charges.
Law enforcement officers investigate criminal activity. Prosecutors make decisions about whether or
not to file a criminal charge against a person.
Contrary to what some
people believe, judges do not control other government officials such as the
county attorney or the sheriff. Both the
sheriff and the county attorney are independent elected local officials. Although the supreme court supervises the
licensing of lawyers in this state, including lawyers who serve as county
attorneys, it does not have the power to make a county attorney file a
particular criminal charge.
Another misconception
involves the enforcement of court orders.
Judges do not initiate actions to enforce court orders such as child
support orders or other civil judgments.
It is up to a party in a case to initiate an action to enforce an order
and to collect a judgment.
Another common
misconception has to do with how judges make decisions. Some people mistakenly believe that judges
make decisions based upon a personal sense of what they believe to be fair
under the circumstances of a case. While
a judge must always be fair in the sense of remaining impartial at all times,
judicial decisions must be based upon the application of the law to the facts
admitted into evidence. Sometimes the
application of the law leads to outcomes that some people would characterize as
"unfair." Nevertheless, judges are
bound to follow the law.