Directories   |   Email Signup   |   Online Court Records   |   Pay Fines   |   Interpreter Roster   |   Attorney Discipline   |   Site Map   |     Site Search    |  
   Friday, November 20, 2009         
Home / Main Menu
Supreme Court
Justices
Opinions
Oral Argument Schedule
Oral Argument Video
Further Review Orders
Orders
2009 Court Calendar
2010 Court Calendar
Request for Speaker
Court of Appeals
District Courts
News Service
Online Court Services
Public Information
Jury Service
Representing Yourself
Court Rules and Forms
Professional Regulation
Administration
Reports
RFPs
Advisory Committees

2009 Winner Justice Served
   
Printable View

 

 

SCREENING STATEMENT

 

No. 08-1200

 

Dubuque County No. LACV055213

 

 

ROBERT E. SABERS and

CATHY SABERS,

          Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 

vs.

 

CALLAHAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

          Defendant,

 

and the CITY OF DUBUQUE,

          Defendant-Appellee.

 

Trial Judge:          John Bauercamper

 

Appellate Counsel:

          Thomas L. Staack and Carolyn A. Rafferty of Dutton, Braun, Staack & Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for appellants.

 

          Les V. Reddick of Kane, Norby & Reddick, P.C., Dubuque, for appellee.

 

Trial Counsel:

          Thomas L. Staack and Farl J. Greene of Dutton, Braun, Staack & Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for appellants. 

 

          Appellate counsel for appellee.

 

          Michael J. Coyle of Fuerste, Carew, Coyle, Juergens & Sudmeier, P.C., Dubuque, for Callahan Construction. 

 

Trial judgment date: 7-2-08

 

Ready date: 3-30-09

 

Case context: Plaintiffs, who brought a negligence action against City alleging that its failure to maintain the shoulder of a road resulted in plaintiff's accident, obtained an interlocutory appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the City. The district court ruled that, because the City's annexation of the area had been ruled invalid at the time of the accident and the appeal was not yet decided, pursuant to Iowa Code section 368.20(2)(2007) the annexation was not complete and the City could not be liable for failing to maintain the roadway.  Plaintiffs contend the court erred and the City was responsible for the area because: (1) the annexation was voluntary in nature and pursuant to Iowa Code section 368.7(3) was complete when approved by the Development Board, rather than at the time it was ultimately upheld on appeal; and (2) even if the annexation was not complete, the City was voluntarily providing road maintenance services to the area during the appeal. 

 


Return to Oral Argument Schedule
   Return to Top

  Supreme Court   Court of Appeals   District Courts   News Service   Online Court Services   Public Information   Jury Service   Representing Yourself   Court Rules and Forms   Professional Regulation   Administration   Reports   RFPs   Advisory Committees
    Career Opportunities   -    State of Iowa   -    Privacy Policy   -    Site Tools and Accessibility   -    Contact Us
   Copyright © 2009 Iowa Judicial Branch