Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1231
View Summary for Case No. 19-1231
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Plymouth County, Julie Schumacher, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Doyle, P.J., and Mullins and Greer, JJ. Schumacher, J., takes no part. Opinion by Mullins, J. (5 pages)
Noel Bender appeals the summary disposition of his application for postconviction relief. OPINION HOLDS: We affirm.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1308
View Summary for Case No. 19-1308
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Ian K. Thornhill, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Schumacher, J. (7 pages)
After entering a guilty plea, Taylor received a deferred judgment. The court revoked the previously granted deferred judgment, imposed sentence, and suspended the term of incarceration. Taylor appeals, contesting his sentence and arguing the trial court failed to consider certain mitigating factors in revoking his deferred judgment. OPINION HOLDS. We find the trial court sufficiently demonstrated its consideration and exercise of discretion when it revoked Taylor’s deferred judgment.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1335
View Summary for Case No. 19-1335
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Decatur County, Gregory A. Hulse, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Tabor, P.J., and May and Greer, JJ. Opinion by May, J. (12 pages)
Bobby McGee appeals the denial of his application for postconviction relief. McGee contends that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate his mental-health condition and competency to stand trial prior to his guilty plea. OPINION HOLDS: Like the district court, we conclude counsel did not breach an essential duty. McGee has also failed to show prejudice. The district court was right to deny relief.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1369
View Summary for Case No. 19-1369
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lee (North) County, Wyatt Peterson, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Tabor, J. (12 pages)
A father appeals the decree awarding the mother physical care of their daughter. The father contends he is in a better position to serve the child’s long-term best interests. OPINION HOLDS: After considering the child’s need for greater stability and continuity, we affirm the district court. The father is unable to pay requested attorney fees, but we assess him costs on appeal.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1370
View Summary for Case No. 19-1370
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Tod Deck, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Mullins and Ahlers, JJ. Opinion by Ahlers, J. (7 pages)
Douglas and his new wife, Ramona Santee, appeal the order denying their challenge to an administrative levy under Iowa Code chapter 252I (2019). OPINION HOLDS: Ramona failed to preserve error on her due process claim. On their equitable estoppel claim, equitable estoppel does not apply to a chapter 252I challenge, and, even if equitable estoppel could apply here, Douglas and Ramona failed to prove equitable estoppel by clear and convincing evidence.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1382
View Summary for Case No. 19-1382
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Sarah Crane, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Tabor, J. (12 pages)
A father appeals the modification of his visitation with three minor children after they and the mother moved out of state to the Chicago suburbs. He contends the interim visitation schedule, where the children fly to visit him in West Des Moines twice a month, is in their best interests. OPINION HOLDS: The modified visitation order, which reduces the children’s visits to Iowa to once per month and increases other periods of visitation with the father to compensate, was in the children’s best interests as frequent travelling had impacted their well-being. We affirm other challenged aspects of the modification and order the parties to pay their own trial and appellate attorney fees.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1454
View Summary for Case No. 19-1454
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Celene Gogerty, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., May, J., and Danilson, S.J. Opinion by Vaitheswaran, P.J. (4 pages)
Emilio Serrano appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for sanctions. OPINION HOLDS: We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Emilio’s motion for sanctions.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1461
View Summary for Case No. 19-1461
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Andrea J. Dryer, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Mullins and Ahlers, JJ. Opinion by Ahlers, J. (5 pages)
Cassandra Greenway appeals the district court order denying her motion in arrest of judgment following her guilty plea. On appeal, Greenway argues her motion should have been granted because her guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered. She asserts her attorney was unprepared to go to trial, so she had no choice but to plead guilty. OPINION HOLDS:
Since Greenway’s guilty plea was accepted before July 1, 2019, recent amendments to Iowa Code section 814.6 do not apply, Greenway has the statutory right to appeal, and we have jurisdiction to hear the appeal. To the extent Greenway’s claim on appeal is an attempt to assert an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, we are unable to address it. To the extent Greenway is arguing her motion in arrest of judgment should have been granted on the merits, the record demonstrates no abuse of discretion by the district court. We affirm.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1463
View Summary for Case No. 19-1463
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Monona County, Tod Deck, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Bower, C.J., and May and Ahlers, JJ. Opinion by Ahlers, J. (5 pages)
Latisha Watson appeals the district court judgment finding her guilty of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Iowa Code section 124.401(5). On appeal, Watson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that she possessed the marijuana. OPINION HOLDS: The witness testimony that Watson handed him marijuana when she realized police were at her house so the witness could “take the rap for her” is sufficient evidence of Watson’s actual possession of the drugs to sustain the guilty finding. We affirm.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1538
View Summary for Case No. 19-1538
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Bradley J. Harris, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Schumacher, J. (7 pages)
Terrell Sallay appeals his conviction for domestic abuse assault causing bodily injury, third or subsequent offense. OPINION HOLDS: We find there is substantial evidence in the record to support Sallay’s conviction. Also, he was not improperly subjected to ex post facto punishment requiring him to serve a more severe sentence than was available at the time the offense was committed. We affirm Sallay’s conviction and sentence.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1561
View Summary for Case No. 19-1561
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Karen Kaufman Salic, District Associate Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Vaitheswaran, P.J. (3 pages)
William Fetner appeals following his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance (marijuana), third or subsequent offense, and driving while barred. Fetner contends the district court considered an “impermissible” and “irrelevant” factor in imposing his sentence. OPINION HOLDS: We affirm Fetner’s judgment and sentence.
Filed Sep 23, 2020
View Opinion No. 19-1607
View Summary for Case No. 19-1607
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, George L. Stigler, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Vaitheswaran, P.J. (6 pages)
Brandon Tate appeals the denial of his application for postconviction relief, arguing his trial attorney was ineffective (1) “by advising [him] not to testify”; (2) for “failing to investigate”; and (3) for “failing to effectively impeach” the woman. OPINION HOLDS: We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Tate’s postconviction-relief application.