Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 23-1732
View Summary for Case No. 23-1732
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, Kurt J. Stoebe, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Tabor, C.J., and Ahlers and Sandy, JJ. Opinion by Sandy, J. (8 pages)
Todd Woodworth appeals the district court’s ruling denying his application for postconviction relief. On appeal, he asserts he received ineffective assistance of counsel from his attorney at his probation revocation hearing because she did not adequately advise him on the benefits of testifying at the hearing. OPINION HOLDS: Because we find Woodworth has not established the necessary prejudice to succeed on an ineffective-assistance claim, we affirm.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 23-1737
View Summary for Case No. 23-1737
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Winnebago County, Karen Kaufman Salic, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Schumacher, P.J., and Badding and Chicchelly, JJ. Opinion by Badding, J. (6 pages)
Brent Shaikoski challenges his conviction for felony eluding of a law enforcement vehicle. OPINION HOLDS: We find there is sufficient evidence to uphold Shaikoski’s conviction. The jury was free to reject Shaikoski’s claim that his passenger took over driving in the middle of the high-speed chase.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 23-1799
View Summary for Case No. 23-1799
Certiorari from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Stuart P. Werling, Judge. WRIT ANNULLED. Considered by Greer, P.J., Buller, J., and Bower, S.J. Opinion by Greer, P.J. (13 pages)
Nasir Abdul-Woodud Shabazz Jr. appeals the district court’s grant of a motion to correct illegal sentence, arguing his original deferred judgment was proper because “supervision” in Illinois does not qualify as “similar relief” under Iowa law. He also claims his counsel at the district court was ineffective. OPINION HOLDS: Because ineffective assistance of counsel claims may only be addressed on postconviction review, we do not make any assessment on the merits of his claim. After comparing “supervision” in Illinois to deferred judgments in Iowa, we find Illinois’s supervision is similar relief for the purposes of Iowa Code section 907.3.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 23-2013
View Summary for Case No. 23-2013
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Andrew Chappell, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Tabor, C.J., and Ahlers and Sandy, JJ. Opinion by Tabor, C.J. (7 pages)
Marsalis Jones challenges both the sufficiency and the weight of the evidence supporting his conviction for felony domestic abuse assault after a jury trial. OPINION HOLDS: Finding no error in the district court’s denial of Jones’s motion for judgment of acquittal and no abuse of discretion in its refusal to grant a new trial, we affirm.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 23-2016
View Summary for Case No. 23-2016
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dallas County, Michael Jacobsen, Judge. APPEAL DISMISSED. Considered by Greer, P.J., and Ahlers and Badding, JJ. Opinion by Ahlers, J. Special Concurrence by Greer, P.J. (4 pages)
Christopher Hidlebaugh attempts to appeal his sentence following a guilty plea. OPINION HOLDS: Hidlebaugh cannot establish good cause to appeal following his guilty plea because he attempts to challenge a sentence that he agreed to as a term of his guilty plea, so we dismiss his attempted appeal. SPECIAL CONCURRENCE ASSERTS: Given the procedural history and our caselaw, I agree that we lack jurisdiction to decide Christopher Hidlebaugh’s appeal. I write separately to highlight that while a defendant’s indigency in no way immunizes him from punishment, incarcerating a defendant based solely on his inability to follow through with a financial undertaking is unconstitutional. I encourage district court judges to carefully scrutinize a plea agreement like the one entered into by Hidlebaugh and the State.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 23-2031
View Summary for Case No. 23-2031
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jefferson County, Shawn Showers, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Schumacher, P.J., and Badding and Chicchelly, JJ. Opinion by Chicchelly, J. (7 pages)
Jeremy Everett Goodale, a juvenile offender, appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to first‑degree murder. OPINION HOLDS: Because the sentencing court thoroughly considered each of the requisite factors afforded to juveniles, we affirm Goodale’s sentence.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 23-2113
View Summary for Case No. 23-2113
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Stewart P. Werling, Judge. AFFIRMED. Heard by Greer, P.J., and Buller and Langholz, JJ. Opinion by Buller, J. (8 pages)
A plaintiff appeals dismissal of a medical negligence action based on decertification of her expert witness as untimely. OPINION HOLDS: Because a trial judge may correct a prior ruling any time before final judgment, the district court was permitted to revisit its prior good‑cause determination under Iowa Code section 668.11 (2019) four years after the initial determination. Finding the district court did not abuse its discretion in later decertifying the expert witness for an absence of good cause under section 668.11 in light of new unpublished caselaw from our court, we affirm.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 24-0065
View Summary for Case No. 24-0065
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Greer, P.J., and Buller and Langholz, JJ. Opinion by Langholz, J. (3 pages)
Terry Lord appeals the dismissal of his application for postconviction relief as time-barred arguing that the statute of limitations is unconstitutional. OPINION HOLDS: Assuming that Lord’s due-process challenge to the statute of limitations is preserved for appellate review, we cannot overrule our supreme court. So we are bound by its prior rejection of a federal due-process challenge to the statute of limitations. To the extent that Lord attempts to make any other state or federal constitutional challenges to the statute of limitations they are waived or not preserved.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 24-0135
View Summary for Case No. 24-0135
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lee (South) County, Clinton R. Boddicker, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Greer, P.J., and Buller and Langholz, JJ. Opinion by Greer, P.J. (2 pages)
Michael Schawitsch appeals the summary dismissal of his sixth application for postconviction relief as time-barred. OPINION HOLDS: While Schawitsch urges us to overrule our supreme court’s prior rejection of a federal due-process challenge to the statute of limitations, we are bound by the controlling precedent. We affirm.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 24-0164
View Summary for Case No. 24-0164
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Russell G. Keast, Judge. APPEAL DISMISSED. Considered by Ahlers, P.J., and Badding and Buller, JJ. Opinion by Buller, J. (2 pages)
A criminal defendant attempts to appeal her conviction for a simple misdemeanor. OPINION HOLDS: To the extent we construe the papers filed as an application for discretionary review, we deny the application and dismiss the attempted appeal.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 24-0188
View Summary for Case No. 24-0188
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Linda M. Fangman, Judge. WRIT ANNULLED. Considered by Greer, P.J., and Ahlers and Badding, JJ. Opinion by Badding, J. Dissent by Greer, P.J. (10 pages)
A former spouse appeals a district court ruling that commenced interest on a judgment lien from the date of the contempt hearing. OPINION HOLDS: Having considered the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, we grant the petition but conclude error is not preserved and annul the writ. DISSENT ASSERTS: Contrary to the majority decision, I would sustain the writ of certiorari. I would find error was preserved on the issue and conclude that interest should run from the end of 2004 instead of the date the application for rule to show cause was filed given Timothy Ott’s stipulation concerning the date of his first refinancing.
Filed Jan 23, 2025
View Opinion No. 24-0194
View Summary for Case No. 24-0194
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, John Telleen, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Greer, P.J., and Buller and Langholz, JJ. Telleen, S.J., takes no part. Opinion by Greer, P.J. (5 pages)
James Martin Peterson appeals his sentences, arguing the district court erred when the court did not place Peterson on probation, allowing for treatment in the community. OPINION HOLDS: Because we find the district court did not abuse its discretion, we uphold the sentences, as imposed, by the district court.