2025 Archive | Court of Appeals Court Opinions

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Lynn Poschner, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Ahlers, P.J., and Badding and Buller, JJ.  Opinion by Badding, J.  (4 pages)

            A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights.  OPINION HOLDS: There is clear and convincing evidence to support the statutory ground for termination under Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(h) (2024), so we affirm. 

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Lynn Poschner, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Greer, P.J., and Langholz and Sandy, JJ.  Opinion by Langholz, J.  (8 pages)

            A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her son, arguing that termination is not in the son’s best interest and the parent–child bond exception applies.  OPINION HOLDS: We agree with the juvenile court that termination of the mother’s parental rights in the son’s best interest.  She has not made progress towards unsupervised visits, still struggles with substance use, and has not fully utilized mental-health services.  And the son is much improved in his foster-care placement and is finally receiving the stable home environment that he needs.  We also agree that the parent–child bond exception does not apply because the mother has not met her burden to prove that termination would be more detrimental to the son than the uncertain status quo.  We thus affirm the juvenile court’s termination of the mother’s parental rights.

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Joan M. Black, Judge.  AFFIRMED ON BOTH APPEALS.  Considered by Badding, P.J., and Buller and Langholz, JJ.  Opinion by Buller, J.  (10 pages)

            A mother and father separately appeal the termination of their parental rights.  OPINION HOLDS: Because the child cannot safely return to the mother’s care due to substance‑abuse problems and additional time was not warranted, we affirm the termination of her parental rights.  Finding the father’s arguments generally thwarted by the indefinite nature of his incarceration and possible deportation, we affirm the termination of the father’s parental rights.

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Cynthia S. Finley, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Ahlers, P.J., and Badding and Buller, JJ.  Opinion by Buller, J.  (4 pages)

            A father appeals the termination of his parental rights to one child.  OPINION HOLDS: Because the father failed to challenge all grounds for termination on appeal, we affirm.

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Scott Strait, Judge.  AFFIRMED ON BOTH APPEALS.  Considered by Tabor, C.J., and Schumacher and Chicchelly, JJ.  Opinion by Chicchelly, J.  (8 pages)

            A mother and father separately appeal the termination of their parental rights to their child, J.C.  OPINION HOLDS: Because we find the statutory grounds for termination have been established, termination is in the best interests of the child, and no permissive exceptions apply, we affirm termination of both parents’ parental rights to J.C.

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Joseph L. Tofilon, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Tabor, C.J., and Schumacher and Chicchelly, JJ.  Opinion by Schumacher, J.  (9 pages)

            A father appeals the termination of his parental rights to three of his children.  He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the grounds for termination, claims termination is not in the children’s best interests because permissive grounds to preclude termination exist, and argues the district court erred in denying his request for additional time to work toward reunification.  OPINION HOLDS: Having found the statutory grounds satisfied, that no permissive exception should be applied, and that an extension of time is unwarranted, we affirm termination of the father’s parental rights.

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Scott Strait, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Greer, P.J., and Schumacher and Chicchelly, JJ.  Opinion by Chicchelly, J.  (7 pages)

            A mother appeals the order terminating her parental rights to two children.  OPINION HOLDS: Because the State proved the grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence and termination is in the children’s best interests, we affirm.

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Joan M. Black, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Ahlers, P.J., and Badding and Buller, JJ.  Opinion by Badding, J.  (8 pages)

            A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights.  OPINION HOLDS: We find the statutory grounds for termination were established, termination is in the best interest of the child, the parent-child bond permissive exception does not apply, and additional time for reunification is not warranted. 

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello County, Greg Milani, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Tabor, C.J., Chicchelly, J., and Vogel, S.J.  Opinion by Vogel, S.J.  (8 pages)

            An applicant appeals the denial of postconviction relief from his incest, lascivious conduct with a minor, and third-degree sexual abuse convictions.  OPINION HOLDS: Because all of the applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel stem from counsel’s reasoned, strategic decisions, counsel did not breach any duty and we affirm the denial of postconviction relief.

    Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, David Nelmark, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Greer, P.J., Langholz, J., and Bower, S.J.  Opinion by Bower, S.J.  (6 pages)

    Gary Wood Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his application for postconviction relief following his 2019 conviction for domestic abuse assault.  Wood claims his appellate counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge the admissibility of a redacted 911 call on direct appeal.  OPINION HOLDS: Because Wood did not establish prejudice, his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim fails.  Accordingly, we affirm. 
 

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Justin Lightfoot, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Greer, P.J., Schumacher, J., and Carr, S.J.  Opinion by Carr, S.J. (7 pages)

            Robert Allen Fisher Jr. appeals his conviction for sexual abuse in the second degree, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.  OPINION HOLDS: Finding substantial evidence supports the conviction, we affirm.

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Calhoun County, Derek Johnson, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Greer, P.J., Buller, J., and Doyle, S.J.  Opinion by Doyle, S.J.  (8 pages)

            After shooting his brother to death, Michael Hinners was charged with first-degree murder.  After a bench trial, the trial court found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter.  The court determined that assault by intentionally pointing any firearm at another—the predicate public offense to Hinners’s involuntary manslaughter conviction—was a general-intent crime.  On appeal Hinners argues assault is a specific-intent crime and the court should have therefore considered his intoxication defense.  OPINION HOLDS: We conclude the crime of assault by intentionally pointing a firearm at another under Iowa Code section 708.1(2)(c) is a general-intent crime.  Involuntary manslaughter, without a specific-intent element, is a general-intent crime.  Thus, the intoxication defense is not available to Hinners.  So, the district court committed no error in not addressing the intoxication defense.  We therefore affirm.