Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 17-1963

State of Iowa
v.
David Jay Nuno

Appellee

State of Iowa

Appellant

David Jay Nuno

Attorneys for Appellee

Genevieve Reinkoester, Assistant Attorney General

Attorneys for Appellant

Theresa R. Wilson, Assistant Appellate Defender

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
17-1963
Date Published:
Apr 03, 2019
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Mills County, Mark J. Eveloff, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Potterfield, P.J., and Tabor and Bower, JJ.  Opinion by Potterfield, P.J.  (17 pages)

            David Nuno appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree sexual abuse.  He argues his right to confront his witnesses was violated, his motion for new trial was incorrectly decided using the wrong standard, and his trial counsel was ineffective several reasons.  OPINION HOLDS: Nuno was not denied the right to confront witnesses, and the district court did not apply the incorrect standard in denying Nuno’s motion for new trial.  We preserve Nuno’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel for possible postconviction-relief proceedings. 

© 2021 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.