State of Iowa
v.
Rayshon T.P. Rushing
Appellee
State of Iowa
Appellant
Rayshon T.P. Rushing
Attorney for the Appellee
Kyle Hanson, Assistant Attorney General
Attorney for the Appellant
Seth Harrington
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Heather L. Lauber and Robert B. Hanson, Judges. AFFIRMED. Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ. Opinion by Bower, J. (7 pages)
Rayshon Rushing appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Rushing claims the district court did not have the authority to place him at a residential facility and revoke his probation for rule violations. He also claims the court erred in ordering him to pay the law-enforcement-initiative surcharge. OPINION HOLDS: We find the court had the authority to place Rushing in the residential facility and to revoke his probation. We find the surcharge was not applied and Rushing’s claim is without merit. We affirm.
