Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 18-2245

In the Interest of L.M., Minor Child

C.M., Father-Appellant

Attorney for Appellant Father

Michael H. Johnson

Attorney for Appellee State

Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General

Attorney and Guardian ad litem

Shawna Nolan Distworth

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Apr 03, 2019

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clay County, Charles Borth, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Potterfield, P.J., Tabor, J., and Danilson, S.J.  Opinion by Danilson, S.J.  (6 pages)

            A father appeals the termination of his parental rights, contending the State failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify him with the child, grounds for termination do not exist, and termination is not in the child’s best interests.  OPINION HOLDS: On our de novo review, we discern no reason to disagree with the juvenile court’s findings and conclusions.  We affirm.

© 2024 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.