In the Interest of L.M., Minor Child
C.M., Father-Appellant
Attorney for Appellant Father
Michael H. Johnson
Attorney for Appellee State
Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General
Attorney and Guardian ad litem
Shawna Nolan Distworth
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clay County, Charles Borth, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Potterfield, P.J., Tabor, J., and Danilson, S.J. Opinion by Danilson, S.J. (6 pages)
A father appeals the termination of his parental rights, contending the State failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify him with the child, grounds for termination do not exist, and termination is not in the child’s best interests. OPINION HOLDS: On our de novo review, we discern no reason to disagree with the juvenile court’s findings and conclusions. We affirm.