In re the Marriage of Garmoe
Amy Rachelle Garmoe, Petitioner-Appellee
Willard Preston Garmoe, III, Respondent-Appellant
Attorney for Appellant
Curtis Dial
Attorney for Appellee
Lori L. Klockau and David M. Cox
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lee (North) County, John M. Wright, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Doyle and May, JJ. Opinion by May, J. (6 pages)
Preston Garmoe appeals the physical care and spousal support provisions of his dissolution decree. He also appeals the district court’s determination that he should pay a portion of Amy Garmoe’s attorney fees. OPINION HOLDS: The physical care and spousal support provisions of the decree are equitable, so we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Preston to pay a portion of Amy’s attorney fees. We decline to award Amy appellate attorney fees.
