In the Interest of A.M., K.M., B.M., L.M., J.M., G.M., J.M., L.M., and A.M., Minor Children
D.M., Father-Appellant
Attorney for Appellant Father
Bryan J. Tingle
Attorney for Appellee State
Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General
Guardian ad Litem for Minor Children A.M. and K.M.
Bryan Webber
Guardian ad Litem for Minor Children J.M., G.M., J.M., L.M., and A.M.
Kelly Ramsey
Guardian ad Litem for Minor Child B.M.
Gregory F. Greiner
Guardian ad Litem for Minor Child L.M.
Kaitlyn DiMaria
Attorney for Minor Children A.M. and K.M.
Brent Pattison
Attorney for Minor Children B.M., J.M., G.M., J.M., L.M., and A.M.
Magdalena Reese
Attorney for Minor Child L.M.
Audra Saunders
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Kimberly Ayotte, District Associate Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Mullins and Ahlers, JJ. Opinion by Mullins, J. (6 pages)
A father appeals the adjudication of his children as children in need of assistance (CINA). The father argues insufficient evidence was presented to support the CINA adjudication. OPINION HOLDS: On our de novo review of the record, we find clear and convincing evidence was presented to support the adjudication of the children.
