In re the Marriage of Weinschenk
Natalie M. Weinschenk, Petitioner-Appellee
Joseph L. Weinschenk Jr., Respondent-Appellant
Attorney for Appellant
Michael J. McCarthy
Attorney for Appellee
Robert J. McGee
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clinton County, Mark R. Lawson, Judge. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. Considered by Mullins, P.J., and May and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Mullins, P.J. (7 pages)
Joseph Weinschenk appeals the economic provisions of the decree dissolving his marriage to Natalie Weinschenk. He argues the court erred in allocating money derived from his premarital equity in real property to Natalie and the court failed to credit him for a home improvement loan liability assigned to him in the decree. OPINON HOLDS: We modify the property distribution relating to the line of credit and recalculate Joseph’s equalization payment accordingly.
