LS Power Midcontinent, LLC v. State
In June 2020, the Iowa legislature passed House File 2643, an omnibus appropriations bill, which included a section granting a right of first refusal (ROFR) (codified in Iowa Code section 478.16 (2020)) to incumbent electric transmission owners for construction and maintenance of Iowa’s electric infrastructure. Plaintiffs—Missouri-based energy companies—filed a petition for declaratory relief requesting the district court declare the ROFR unconstitutional and seeking injunctive relief to prevent the publication or enforcement of the new law. The district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss based on a lack of standing. The court of appeals affirmed finding plaintiffs cannot satisfy the injury-in-fact prong of the standing test, and declining to apply a public-importance exception to the standing requirement. Plaintiffs seek further review.
LS Power Midcontinent, LLC and Southwest Transmission, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants
State of Iowa, Iowa Utilities Board, Geri D. Huser, Glen Dickinson and Leslie Hickey, Defendants-Appellees
MidAmerican Energy Company and ITC Midwest LLC, Intervenors
Attorneys for Appellants
Charles F. Becker
Michael R. Reck
Erika L. Bauer
Attorneys for Appellees
David M. Ranscht, Assistant Attorney General
Benjamin Flickinger, Assistant Attorney General
Attorneys for Intervenors
Elizabeth R. Meyer
Stanley J. Thompson
Tara Z. Hall
Amy Monopoli
Bret A. Dublinske
Lisa M. Agrimonti
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae
Kelly A. Cwiertny
Theresa Davis
Lynn Herndon
Kenneth R. Stark
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
15-15-5
Feb 21, 2023 1:30 PM
Briefs
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Date Amended:
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Celene Gogerty, Judge. AFFIRMED. Heard by May, P.J., and Greer and Chicchelly, JJ. Opinion by Greer, J. (18 pages)
LS Power Midcontinent, LLC, and Southwest Transmission, LLC, (collectively LSP) together appeal the dismissal of their case for lack of standing and request injunctive relief at this appellate stage. OPINION HOLDS: As LSP lacks standing—either by way of traditional standing or the public importance exception—to bring this case, we affirm the district court’s dismissal and deny LSP’s request for a temporary injunction.