Liberko v. Rath
Nicholas Liberko, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
Nathan Allen Rath, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Renaissance Renovations Construction, Inc. Defendant.
Attorney for Appellant
Nathan A. Rath, self-represented
Attorney for Appellee
Chad D. Brakhahn and Matthew L. Roth
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
21-0899
Date Published:
Jun 29, 2022
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Fae Hoover Grinde, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Bower, C.J., Ahlers, J., and Blane, S.J. Chicchelly, J., takes no part. Opinion by Blane, S.J. (4 pages)
Nathan Rath appeals the default judgment and damages against him arguing plaintiff Nicholas Liberko did not prove his piercing-the-corporate-veil claim against him. OPINION HOLDS: Rath failed to preserve his issue for appeal. We affirm.
