Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 23-1092

State of Iowa
v.
Clifford Arnell Gooden, III

County:
Scott

Appellee

State of Iowa

Appellant

Clifford Arnell Gooden, III

Attorney for the Appellee

Anagha Dixit (argued) and Olivia D. Brooks, Assistant Attorneys General

Attorney for the Appellant

Webb L. Wassmer (argued)

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
23-1092
Date Published:
Jun 18, 2025
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Korie Talkington, Henry W. Latham II, Stuart P. Werling, and Meghan Corbin, Judges.  AFFIRMED.  Heard at oral argument by Greer, P.J., and Badding and Chicchelly, JJ.  Opinion by Greer, P.J.  (11 pages)

            A jury found Clifford Gooden III guilty of second-degree burglary.  On appeal, Gooden argues his constitutional right to counsel was violated because the district court allowed him to represent himself at critical stages of the prosecution leading up to trial without first obtaining a valid waiver of his right to counsel.  Gooden also argues the district court should have sua sponte instructed the jury to not consider the fact he voluntarily absented himself from trial when deciding whether he was guilty of the charged offense.  OPINION HOLDS: While Gooden was denied the right to representation at critical stages of the proceedings before he validly waived his right five days before trial started, the denial of his constitutional right did not affect the framework of the proceedings in this case; Gooden is not entitled to a new trial.  And we cannot find the district court committed legal error by not sua sponte giving a jury instruction that is not required by Iowa law.  We affirm Gooden’s conviction.

© 2026 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.