For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here.
In re the Marriage of Tassinari
Sarah J. Tassinari, Petitioner-Appellee
Steven P. Tassinari, Respondent-Appellant
Attorney for Appellant
Dani L. Eisentrager
Attorney for Appellee
Becky S. Knutson
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wright County, Gregg R. Rosenbladt, Judge. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. Heard by Danilson, C.J., and Potterfield and Doyle, JJ. Opinion by Doyle, J. (12 pages)
Steven Tassinari appeals the economic provisions of the district court’s decree dissolving his marriage to Sarah Tassinari. OPINION HOLDS: Upon our de novo review of the record, considering all relevant factors, we find division of the marital assets between Steven and Sarah should be equal. Steven should be awarded another $18,204.91 to balance the ledger sheet. Consequently, we modify the district court’s decree by increasing the equalization payment to Steven to $129,075.31. We affirm in all other respects.
