Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 18-0645

For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here

State of Iowa
v.
Rayshon T.P. Rushing

Appellee

State of Iowa

Appellant

Rayshon T.P. Rushing

Attorneys for Appellee

Kyle Hanson, Assistant Attorney General

Attorneys for Appellant

Seth Harrington

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
18-0645
Date Published:
Oct 09, 2019
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Heather L. Lauber and Robert B. Hanson, Judges.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ.  Opinion by Bower, J.  (7 pages)

            Rayshon Rushing appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm.  Rushing claims the district court did not have the authority to place him at a residential facility and revoke his probation for rule violations.  He also claims the court erred in ordering him to pay the law-enforcement-initiative surcharge.  OPINION HOLDS: We find the court had the authority to place Rushing in the residential facility and to revoke his probation.  We find the surcharge was not applied and Rushing’s claim is without merit.  We affirm.

© 2022 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.