For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here.
Dean Thorson
v.
Thomas Hansen and Jeanett Hansen
Appellee
Dean Thorson
Appellant
Thomas Hansen and Jeanett Hansen
Attorney for the Appellee
James A. Garrett
Attorneys for the Appellant
Erik W. Fern
Andrew J. Casper
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Winneshiek County, Linda M. Fangman, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Mullins, P.J., Bower, J., and Vogel, S.J. Opinion by Bower, J. (11 pages)
Thomas and Jeanett Hansen appeal a trial court order finding in favor of Dean Thorson in a conversion and breach-of-contract action relating to a hay crop and farm-rental agreement. The Hansens claim the trial court erred in denying their motion for new trial because Thorson made knowing material misrepresentations during trial that prejudiced the Hansens and the court erred in law and made a mistake of fact as to the date of conversion. OPINION HOLDS: We find the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial and did not make an error of law or mistake of fact. We affirm.