For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here.
In the Interest of B.F., B.L., and B.L., Minor Children
Attorney for Appellant Mother
Shane P. O'Toole
Attorney for Appellee State
Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General
Guardian ad Litem
Kelsey Lynn Knight
Attorney for Minor Child B.F.
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Susan Cox, District Associate Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Schumacher, JJ. Opinion by Tabor, J. (7 pages)
A mother, Katie, appeals the termination of her parental relationship to her three children: B.F., Ba.L., and Bl.L. Katie argues the juvenile court erred in refusing to grant her an additional six months to work toward recovery and returning her children to her care. She also challenges two statutory grounds for termination and contends the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that her parental rights should be terminated pursuant to Iowa Code section 232.116(1) (2019), paragraphs (f) and (h). Lastly, Katie argues termination is not in the children’s best interests. OPINION HOLDS: Because the record reflects a history of repeated unsuccessful attempts at treatment, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that a need for removal will not exist in six months to justify an extension. Also, Katie does not challenge, and therefore waives, any error related to the court’s finding the State proved the grounds for termination under section 232.116(1)(l). Further, based on the significant mental-health challenges the children have already faced, we find the State showed, pursuant to section 232.116(2), that termination is in the children’s best interests. Finally, no factor under section 232.116(3) warrants delaying termination. We affirm the decision of the juvenile court.