For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here.
In the Interest of R.S., Minor Child
M.S., Father-Appellant
Attorney for Appellant Father
Peter Stiefel
Attorney for Appellee State
Ellen Ramsey-Kacena, Assistant Attorney General
Guardian ad Litem
Misty White
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Keokuk County, Daniel Kitchen, District Associate Judge. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED. Considered by Bower, C.J., and Vaitheswaran and Greer, JJ. Opinion by Bower, C.J. (9 pages)
A father appeals the termination of his parental rights. OPINION HOLDS: We find the father was not prejudiced by the disputed exhibit, clear and convincing evidence supports termination, termination is in the child’s best interests, no factor weighs against termination, and a guardianship is not appropriate. We affirm and remand to the juvenile court for entry of a nunc pro tunc order.
