Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 21-0899

For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here

Liberko v. Rath

Nicholas Liberko, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

Nathan Allen Rath, Defendant-Appellant,

and

Renaissance Renovations Construction, Inc. Defendant.

Attorney for Appellant

Nathan A. Rath, self-represented

Attorney for Appellee

Chad D. Brakhahn and Matthew L. Roth

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
21-0899
Date Published:
Jun 29, 2022
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Fae Hoover Grinde, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Bower, C.J., Ahlers, J., and Blane, S.J.  Chicchelly, J., takes no part.  Opinion by Blane, S.J.  (4 pages)

            Nathan Rath appeals the default judgment and damages against him arguing plaintiff Nicholas Liberko did not prove his piercing-the-corporate-veil claim against him.  OPINION HOLDS: Rath failed to preserve his issue for appeal.  We affirm.

© 2022 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.