Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 22-0263

For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here

In the Interest of H.B., Minor Child

A.B., Father-Appellant

Attorney for Appellant Father

Joseph P. Goedken

Attorney for Appellee State

Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General

Guardian ad Litem

Sam K. Erhardt

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
22-0263
Date Published:
Apr 27, 2022
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello County, William S. Owens, Associate Juvenile Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Greer and Ahlers, JJ.  Opinion by Greer, J.  (7 pages)

            A father appeals the termination of his parental rights.  He argues the State did not make reasonable efforts, the juvenile court should have established a guardianship in lieu of terminating his parental rights, and the closeness of the bond with his child overcomes the need for termination.  OPINION HOLDS: The father did not preserve his reasonable-efforts challenge.  Because termination of the father’s parental rights is in the child’s best interests, a guardianship in lieu of termination is not an option.  And while the child is strongly bonded with the father, he has not shown this bond overcomes termination being in the child’s best interests.

© 2022 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.