For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here.
In re Marriage of Marasco
Albert Phillip Marasco, Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee
Julie Marasco, Respondent-Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Attorney for Appellant
David J. Hellstern
Attorney for Appellee
Nathan A. Russell
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Celene Gogerty, Judge. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED ON APPEAL; AFFIRMED ON CROSS-APPEAL. Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Ahlers and Buller, JJ. Opinion by Ahlers, J. (10 pages)
Albert Marasco appeals from the decree dissolving his marriage; and Julie Marasco cross-appeals. Both challenge the district court’s property distribution. OPINION HOLDS: The district court’s property division was equitable. However, it inadvertently attributed some non-marital assets to the marital estate and accidentally included a retirement account that the parties agree does not exist. We modify the property division to account for these discrepancies while otherwise maintaining the district court’s division of property. We decline to award Julie appellate attorney fees.
