For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here.
State of Iowa
v.
Hunter Noel Casto
Appellee
State of Iowa
Appellant
Hunter Noel Casto
Attorney for the Appellee
Joshua A. Duden, Assistant Attorney General
Attorney for the Appellant
Shellie L. Knipfer, Assistant Appellate Defender
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt, Judge. SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING. Considered by Tabor, P.J., Chicchelly, J., and Danilson, S.J. Opinion by Danilson, S.J. (6 pages)
Hunter Casto appeals his sentence following his conviction for second-degree sexual abuse. He argues the district court was not aware it had the discretion to suspend a special sentence and failed to provide adequate reasoning for imposing the selected sentence. OPINION HOLDS: The district court had the discretion to suspend the special sentence because Casto was under the age of eighteen at the time of the offense. The district court did not know it had the ability to suspend the special sentence. Because the district was unaware of this discretion, resentencing is necessary. With respect to the remainder of the sentence, the district court relied on boilerplate sentencing statements and failed to provide individualized sentencing rationale, also necessitating resentencing. We vacate Casto’s sentence and remand for resentencing.