Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 23-0969

For summaries from opinions prior to August, 2018, view PDF versions here

State of Iowa
v.
Jordan Dee Andrews Webb

Appellee

State of Iowa

Appellant

Jordan Dee Andrews Webb

Attorney for the Appellee

Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney General

Attorney for the Appellant

Josh Irwin, Assistant Appellate Defender

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
23-0969
Date Published:
Oct 02, 2024
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Angela L. Doyle and Christopher C. Polking, Judges.  AFFIRMED.  Heard by Tabor, C.J., and Chicchelly and Sandy, JJ.  Opinion by Tabor, C.J. (22 pages)           

            Jordan Webb appeals his convictions for second-degree sexual abuse, incest, and child endangerment.  He contends there is insufficient evidence to support the verdicts and the district court erred in admitting hearsay statements made by the child victim, denying his motion for mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct, and denying his motion for new trial based on his challenge to the weight of the evidence.  OPINION HOLDS: We find substantial evidence supports the verdicts.  The district court committed harmless error when it admitted the child’s hearsay statements, and it did not abuse its discretion in admitting the statements over Webb’s rule 5.403 objection or denying Webb’s motion for new trial.  Webb failed to preserve error on his prosecutorial misconduct claim.  We affirm.

© 2026 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.