Dennis Workman
v.
Gary Workman, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Margaret E. Workman
In this probate appeal the appellant argues: 1) the district court erred in determining the burden of proof did not shift to the appellee as a result of a confidential relationship and undue influence; and 2) the district court erred in denying his motion to amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence.
County:
Page
Applicant
Dennis Workman
Resister
Gary Workman, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Margaret E. Workman
Attorney for the Applicant
Eric M. Updegraff
Attorney for the Resister
Daniel P. Kresowik
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
Non-Oral
Sep 13, 2017 1:30 PM
Briefs
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
15-2126
Date Published:
Oct 20, 2017
Other Information
Date Further Review is Granted:
Jun 28, 2017