State of Iowa
v.
Anthony Antoine Harris
Anthony Antoine Harris seeks further review of the court of appeals opinion that affirmed his convictions for one count of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and two counts of delivery of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. The court of appeals found that error was not preserved on Harris’s arguments regarding implied hearsay or indirect hearsay evidence and denied his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The court of appeals further rejected Harris’s argument that the evidence was insufficient to establish he possessed methamphetamine. In his application for further review, Harris contends the court should grant further review because of the court of appeals’ holding that repeated objections are required to preserve error is inconsistent with this court’s prior decisions, and further review is necessary because the district court erred in allowing the introduction of inadmissible hearsay from absent witnesses, implying that they purchased drugs from Harris.
Resister
State of Iowa
Applicant
Anthony Antoine Harris
Attorney for the Resister
Martha E. Trout, Assistant Attorney General
Attorney for the Applicant
Gary D. Dickey
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
Non-Oral
Oct 17, 2018 1:30 PM