Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 19-0499

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
v.
Edward F. Noyes

The respondent contends (1) there was no longer a pending or contemplated litigation when he advanced or disbursed funds to one of his clients, (2) the Grievance Commission findings of fact should be supplemented to include evidence respondent retained a certified public accountant and a certified quick books consultant to oversee the accounting of respondent’s client trust account, (3) he made reasonable efforts to comply with Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct 32:5.3(a), and (4) the evidence does not establish he violated rule 32:1.15.

Appellee

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board

Appellant

Edward F. Noyes

Attorneys for Appellee

Wendell J. Harms

Attorneys for Appellant

Edward F. Noyes, pro se

Supreme Court

Oral Argument Schedule

Non-Oral

Oct 21, 2019 1:30 PM Iowa Supreme Court Courtroom

Supreme Court Opinion

Opinion Number:
19-0499
Date Published:
Dec 13, 2019

View archived opinions from prior to November 2017

© 2020 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.