Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
v.
Eric Tindal
The respondent contends the Grievance Commission erred in (1) finding respondent violated rule 32:8.4(d), (2) finding respondent’s prior reprimand would have been more severe had the additional default notices been available at the time, and (3) recommending a thirty day suspension.
Appellee
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
Appellant
Eric Tindal
Attorneys for the Appellee
Tara van Brederode
Wendell J. Harms
Attorney for the Appellant
Alexander E. Wonio
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
Non-Oral
Sep 16, 2020 1:30 PM
Briefs
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
20-0005
Date Published:
Oct 09, 2020
Date Amended:
Dec 10, 2020