Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 20-0005

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
v.
Eric Tindal

The respondent contends the Grievance Commission erred in (1) finding respondent violated rule 32:8.4(d), (2) finding respondent’s prior reprimand would have been more severe had the additional default notices been available at the time, and (3) recommending a thirty day suspension.

Appellees

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board

Appellant

Eric Tindal

Attorneys for Appellees

Tara van Brederode
Wendell J. Harms

Attorneys for Appellant

Alexander E. Wonio

Supreme Court

Oral Argument Schedule

Non-Oral

Sep 16, 2020 1:30 PM

Briefs

Supreme Court Opinion

Opinion Number:
20-0005
Date Published:
Oct 09, 2020
Date Amended:
Dec 10, 2020

View archived opinions from prior to November 2017

© 2022 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.