Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
v.
John Karl Fischer
The respondent contends the Grievance Commission erred in (1) concluding Fischer’s conduct was prejudicial to the administration of justice and (2) finding Fischer withdrew unearned fees from a client’s account and he misappropriated client funds without a colorable future claim. In addition, Fischer contends the recommended sanction is not supported by the evidence and the Commission failed to consider all relevant factors.
Appellee
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
Appellant
John Karl Fischer
Attorneys for the Appellee
Crystal Rink
Alexis Grove
Attorneys for the Appellant
Eashaan Vajpeyi
Melissa Ament
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
Feb 23, 2022 1:30 PM
Briefs
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
21-1068
Date Published:
Apr 15, 2022
Date Amended:
Jun 16, 2022