Mitchell
v.
City of Cedar Rapids et al.
Defendants in a suit for damages arising from an officer-involved shooting incident were granted permission for an interlocutory appeal challenging district court orders entered on defendants’ motion for a protective order. Defendants contend the district court abused its discretion by ordering them to produce investigative reports and other police department materials without also entering a protective order prohibiting plaintiffs from disseminating those materials to parties outside the litigation.
County:
Linn
Trial Court Case No.:
LACV087209
Appellee
Mitchell
Appellant
City of Cedar Rapids et al.
Attorneys for the Appellee
Larry R. Rogers Jr.
Emily Anderson
Pressley Henningsen
Laura Seelau
Attorneys for the Appellant
Elizabeth D. Jacobi
Wilford H. Stone
Gregory T. Usher
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
15-15-5
Feb 05, 2019 7:00 PM
Briefs
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
18-0124
Date Published:
Apr 05, 2019
Date Amended:
Jun 21, 2019
Other Information
Date Retained:
Aug 29, 2018