Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
v.
Edward F. Noyes
The respondent contends (1) there was no longer a pending or contemplated litigation when he advanced or disbursed funds to one of his clients, (2) the Grievance Commission findings of fact should be supplemented to include evidence respondent retained a certified public accountant and a certified quick books consultant to oversee the accounting of respondent’s client trust account, (3) he made reasonable efforts to comply with Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct 32:5.3(a), and (4) the evidence does not establish he violated rule 32:1.15.
Appellee
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board
Appellant
Edward F. Noyes
Attorney for the Appellee
Wendell J. Harms
Attorney for the Appellant
Edward F. Noyes, pro se
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
Non-Oral
Oct 21, 2019 1:30 PM Iowa Supreme Court Courtroom
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
19-0499
Date Published:
Dec 13, 2019
