Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 20-1467

David Alan Feeback
v.
Swift Pork Company, Troy Mulgrew and Todd Carl

David Feeback appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment, arguing it employed incorrect legal standards with respect to a claim of employment discrimination and improperly weighed the evidence or opined on credibility.

County:
Marshall

Resister

David Alan Feeback

Applicants

Swift Pork Company, Troy Mulgrew and Todd Carl

Attorneys for Resister

Bruce H. Stoltze Jr.

Attorneys for Applicants

Aaron A. Clark
Ruth A. Horvatich

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
20-1467
Date Published:
Mar 30, 2022
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, Bethany Currie, Judge.  AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.  Heard by Bower, C.J., and Tabor and Chicchelly, JJ.  Opinion by Tabor, J.  (15 pages)

            David Feeback appeals the grant of summary judgment on his claims of age discrimination, workplace harassment, and wrongful termination.  OPINION HOLDS: Considering Feeback’s evidence in the most favorable light, a jury could find Swift fired him because of his age.  So we reverse on the age discrimination claim and remand for trial.  But no genuine issues of material fact exist on the remaining claims, and we affirm summary judgment as to them.

Other Information

Date Further Review is Granted:
Jun 28, 2022
© 2023 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.