Skip to main content
Iowa Judicial Branch
Main Content

Case No. 21-1676

State of Iowa
v.
Nelson Carlos Flores

Nelson Flores seeks further review after the court of appeals affirmed his convictions for crimes relating to sexual abuse of a child. Flores argues the court of appeals erred 1) in finding his right to a speedy trial was not violated, and that good cause existed for a continuance; 2) in determining the admission of the child victim’s forensic interview was harmless error; and 3) in affirming the admittance of co-conspirator statements.

County:
Crawford
Trial Court Case No.:
FECR067438

Resister

State of Iowa

Applicant

Nelson Carlos Flores

Attorney for the Resister

Benjamin Parrott

Attorneys for the Applicant

Tyler D. McIntosh
Christopher J. Roth

Supreme Court

Oral Argument Schedule

15-15-5

Oct 11, 2023 9:00 AM

Briefs

Supreme Court Opinion

Opinion Number:
21-1676
Date Published:
Jan 26, 2024

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals Opinion

Opinion Number:
21-1676
Date Published:
May 10, 2023
Summary

            Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Crawford County, Zachary Hindman, Judge.  AFFIRMED.  Heard by Vaitheswaran, P.J., Badding, J., and Doyle, S.J.  Opinion by Vaitheswaran, P.J.  (14 pages)

            Nelson Flores appeals his convictions for crimes relating to sexual abuse of a child, challenging (I) a claimed violation of his speedy trial right; (II) the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s findings of guilt; (III) the admission of a recorded interview of the child; (IV) the admission of co-conspirator statements concerning a plan to leave the state; (V) the denial of his motion for new trial; and (VI) his attorney’s performance.  OPINION HOLDS: We affirm the jury’s findings of guilt and the judgment and sentence.

Other Information

Date Further Review is Granted:
Aug 17, 2023
© 2024 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.