Watch Oral Arguments Live
State of Iowa
v.
Darius LeJuan Wade
Darius Wade appealed his convictions for possession of a firearm by a felon as a habitual offender and operating while intoxicated, second offense. Wade argued there was insufficient evidence to support the firearm conviction and that the district court entered an illegal sentence by failing to fix a definite term of years for probation. The court of appeals affirmed. Wade seeks further review.
Resister
State of Iowa
Applicant
Darius LeJuan Wade
Attorney for the Resister
Anagha Dixit
Attorney for the Applicant
Mary K. Conroy
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
Non-Oral
Mar 20, 2024 9:30 AM
Briefs
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Date Amended:
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Buchanan County, Kellyann M. Lekar, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Greer, P.J., Badding, J., and Scott, S.J. Opinion by Scott, S.J. (9 pages)
Darius Wade appeals his convictions for possession of a firearm or offensive weapon by a felon as a habitual offender and operating while intoxicated, second offense. Wade challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the firearm conviction and the sentence imposed by the district court. OPINION HOLDS: Upon our review, we affirm.