Daniel Murillo
v.
State of Iowa
Daniel Murillo seeks further review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the district court’s denial of his application for removal from the sex offender registry. He argues that the court of appeals erred when it determined Mr. Murillo had not completed his court-ordered sex offender treatment programming, and thus should not be removed from the registry.
Applicant
Daniel Murillo
Resister
State of Iowa
Attorney for the Applicant
Jesse A. Macro, Jr.
Attorney for the Resister
Nicholas E. Siefert
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
Non-Oral
Oct 10, 2024 1:30 PM
Briefs
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Opinion
Opinion Number:
Date Published:
Summary
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Samantha Gronewald, Judge. AFFIRMED. Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Badding and Chicchelly, JJ. Opinion by Badding, J. (7 pages)
Daniel Murillo appeals the denial of his application to modify sex offender registry requirements, claiming the court erred in determining he did not satisfy one of the threshold requirements for modification and abused its discretion in otherwise concluding modification should not occur. OPINION HOLDS: Finding no legal error or abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s denial of Murillo’s application to modify.